I was excited like a kid waiting for an ice cream. I’ve been reading religiously the live transcript of the WWDC07 keynote at 1pm… but in the end I was disappointed.
Steve Jobs demonstrated a polished version of Leopard but the core features were the one we already knew about… for one year. I guess we’ve been expected far too much this time.

Leopard is still amazing make no mistake about that. Here is a quick list of the features introduced by Steve Jobs:
- a consistent theme across applications (brushed metal is gone);
- a fancy new dock with the ability to stack windows;
- an iTunes-like new Finder with cover flow to browse visually your files;
- a quick way to search for files on remote computers using Spotlight;
- an instant previewer called QuickLook;
- plus the classic iChat Theater, Core Animation, Spaces and Time Machine.
Maybe the thing that surprised everybody was the announce about Safari 3.0 running on Windows — as a mean to expand its market share. I don’t buy it. It’s more likely because of the iPhone.
Steve Jobs said that “no SDK is required” for the iPhone because of Safari; developers have everything they need to build Web 2.0 + AJAX apps — if you can call that “apps” — so Windows developers would need the platform to test their web app on. John Gruber wrote an interesting post about how Apple could earn more money by putting Safari on Windows because of Google deals with browser manufacturers.
No iLife 07, no new hardware or any Google/.Mac integration rumors were actually announced. Ok, the WWDC is a developer conference so it might not be the good place to talk about that. Anyway, I guess we’ll have more information about the very core changes in Leopard as developers dig into the beta.
After all, Steve said that 300 features have been included in Leopard and he showcased only 10 of them. That said Leopard will be a great release and I’ll upgrade as soon as it is available (in october 2007).
I guess we’ve been used to eat good food for the last 3 years.
Read more,
CTO at
Comments
Safari 3 Windows Review, Benchmark…
Safari has a new version, and a new platform. The once mac-only web browser has released Safari 3 for Windows XP, backed by claims of UI, performance, and integration superiority. The claims are that it is 2x faster in Javascript and HTML rendering, …
Elliott Back12 June 07 at 7:08 am
Safari 3 Windows Review, Benchmark…
Safari has a new version, and a new platform. The once mac-only web browser has released Safari 3 for Windows XP, backed by claims of UI, performance, and integration superiority. The claims are that it is 2x faster in Javascript and HTML rendering, …
Elliott Back12 June 07 at 1:08 am
Something interesting is His Steveness (as they call him) didn’t mention Java once.
Are we gonna have the alphageeks (mostly Mac zealots) moving away from Java just like what is happening with Microsoft as a result ? What do you think Fred ?
And : any reason why Leopard is postponed yet again ?
cecil dijoux12 June 07 at 11:27 am
Something interesting is His Steveness (as they call him) didn’t mention Java once.
Are we gonna have the alphageeks (mostly Mac zealots) moving away from Java just like what is happening with Microsoft as a result ? What do you think Fred ?
And : any reason why Leopard is postponed yet again ?
cecil dijoux12 June 07 at 5:27 am
Actually, Safari on Windows..
– is not 100%-compatible with its OSX counter-part, e.g. in its current state, it can’t display Gmail’s “Compose Mail” button (but it does on OSX)
– just looks strange on Windows, thanks to its custom TTF fonts & uncoherent GUI
– crashes on my PC machine when accessing basic features (managing bookmarks..)
– has no market (IE, Opera, Firefox are the leaders and here to stay) excepted developers in search of Apple compatibility with iPhone/OSX’s Safari
Seriously, I just can’t understand such a move. It does not make any sense to me.
What next ? iChat ? other iApps ? .. damn, it sucks.
Arnoldo12 June 07 at 2:27 pm
And oh, BTW – I just noticed WMP video format-support is actually provided by… an external Firefox plugin, directly downloadable from Apple website.
Arnoldo12 June 07 at 2:32 pm
Actually, Safari on Windows..
– is not 100%-compatible with its OSX counter-part, e.g. in its current state, it can’t display Gmail’s “Compose Mail” button (but it does on OSX)
– just looks strange on Windows, thanks to its custom TTF fonts & uncoherent GUI
– crashes on my PC machine when accessing basic features (managing bookmarks..)
– has no market (IE, Opera, Firefox are the leaders and here to stay) excepted developers in search of Apple compatibility with iPhone/OSX’s Safari
Seriously, I just can’t understand such a move. It does not make any sense to me.
What next ? iChat ? other iApps ? .. damn, it sucks.
Arnoldo12 June 07 at 8:27 am
And oh, BTW – I just noticed WMP video format-support is actually provided by… an external Firefox plugin, directly downloadable from Apple website.
Arnoldo12 June 07 at 8:32 am
@cecil — Java will be in the tech landscape for a long time — pretty much like C or C++ are — but it doesn’t really matter. Mac developers have always been Objective C fan.
Apple has already dropped the support of Java for desktop development but Java can still be used on Macs for server-side applications. Leopard will be bundled with Java, Ruby, Python and PHP.
Sun has made terrible mistakes. They were too slow in giving support to the community and OS vendors. Now that Java has been open sourced it will sure be more easy to integrate within the core services of an OS (Linux or OS X). But I’m afraid it’s too late. Microsoft has .NET and Apple has Objective-C 2.0 (featuring dynamic runtime and garbage collection) — good enough for most developers and perfectly integrated with the OS.
As far as Leopard release is concerned, debugging an OS is terrible and Apple had to port a lot of core apps to take advantages of Leopard unique features. I’m not that surprised and I’d rather wait for a great release. I trust Apple in that regard.
Frederic Brunel13 June 07 at 3:52 am
@arnoldo — I agree, Safari for Windows is a terrible (beta) release full of bugs. I guess the strategy is to allow developers to test iPhone apps on Safari, so they need the platform.
Frederic Brunel13 June 07 at 3:59 am
@cecil — Java will be in the tech landscape for a long time — pretty much like C or C++ are — but it doesn’t really matter. Mac developers have always been Objective C fan.
Apple has already dropped the support of Java for desktop development but Java can still be used on Macs for server-side applications. Leopard will be bundled with Java, Ruby, Python and PHP.
Sun has made terrible mistakes. They were too slow in giving support to the community and OS vendors. Now that Java has been open sourced it will sure be more easy to integrate within the core services of an OS (Linux or OS X). But I’m afraid it’s too late. Microsoft has .NET and Apple has Objective-C 2.0 (featuring dynamic runtime and garbage collection) — good enough for most developers and perfectly integrated with the OS.
As far as Leopard release is concerned, debugging an OS is terrible and Apple had to port a lot of core apps to take advantages of Leopard unique features. I’m not that surprised and I’d rather wait for a great release. I trust Apple in that regard.
Fred Brunel12 June 07 at 9:52 pm
@arnoldo — I agree, Safari for Windows is a terrible (beta) release full of bugs. I guess the strategy is to allow developers to test iPhone apps on Safari, so they need the platform.
Fred Brunel12 June 07 at 9:59 pm