<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>BUY Mega Hoodia ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fredbrunel.com/journal/2006/01/first-intel-macs-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fredbrunel.com/journal/2006/01/first-intel-macs-available/</link>
	<description>Insights about high-tech software and web business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:06:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>BUY Mega Hoodia ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
		<link>http://fredbrunel.com/journal/2006/01/first-intel-macs-available/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic Brunel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredbrunel.com/journal/2006/01/first-intel-macs-available/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi David,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I didn&#039;t have yet the opportunity to try one of these new computers. I suppose there won&#039;t be any major difference from the outside.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having an Intel architecture won&#039;t solve every problems of development. Write software for MacOS X will still be totally different from a Windows software and will requirement the same amount of work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But virtualization software like VMware will be able to run x86 system at full speed, that&#039;s a good news.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Talking about Linux, Ubuntu already runs perfectly on PPC Macs, they have already all the drivers working. Switching to Intel won&#039;t be too hard, the system architecture is not so different.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>

<p>I didn&#8217;t have yet the opportunity to try one of these new computers. I suppose there won&#8217;t be any major difference from the outside.</p>

<p>Having an Intel architecture won&#8217;t solve every problems of development. Write software for MacOS X will still be totally different from a Windows software and will requirement the same amount of work.</p>

<p>But virtualization software like VMware will be able to run x86 system at full speed, that&#8217;s a good news.</p>

<p>Talking about Linux, Ubuntu already runs perfectly on PPC Macs, they have already all the drivers working. Switching to Intel won&#8217;t be too hard, the system architecture is not so different.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>BUY Mega Hoodia ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
		<link>http://fredbrunel.com/journal/2006/01/first-intel-macs-available/comment-page-1/#comment-21777</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Brunel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredbrunel.com/journal/2006/01/first-intel-macs-available/#comment-21777</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi David,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn&#039;t have yet the opportunity to try one of these new computers. I suppose there won&#039;t be any major difference from the outside.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having an Intel architecture won&#039;t solve every problems of development. Write software for MacOS X will still be totally different from a Windows software and will requirement the same amount of work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But virtualization software like VMware will be able to run x86 system at full speed, that&#039;s a good news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Talking about Linux, Ubuntu already runs perfectly on PPC Macs, they have already all the drivers working. Switching to Intel won&#039;t be too hard, the system architecture is not so different.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,<br /><br />I didn&#8217;t have yet the opportunity to try one of these new computers. I suppose there won&#8217;t be any major difference from the outside.<br /><br />Having an Intel architecture won&#8217;t solve every problems of development. Write software for MacOS X will still be totally different from a Windows software and will requirement the same amount of work.<br /><br />But virtualization software like VMware will be able to run x86 system at full speed, that&#8217;s a good news.<br /><br />Talking about Linux, Ubuntu already runs perfectly on PPC Macs, they have already all the drivers working. Switching to Intel won&#8217;t be too hard, the system architecture is not so different.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>BUY Mega Hoodia ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
		<link>http://fredbrunel.com/journal/2006/01/first-intel-macs-available/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredbrunel.com/journal/2006/01/first-intel-macs-available/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow!  This sounds very bad for Motorola and IBM, yet good for potential users.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And it signals a green light to those who were postponing development of products for Mac OS X.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also another archtectre for x86 Linux to support :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am mostly interested to hear if they are cool and quiet, or a little hot under the covers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  This sounds very bad for Motorola and IBM, yet good for potential users.</p>

<p>And it signals a green light to those who were postponing development of products for Mac OS X.</p>

<p>Also another archtectre for x86 Linux to support <img src='http://fredbrunel.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>I am mostly interested to hear if they are cool and quiet, or a little hot under the covers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>BUY Mega Hoodia ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
		<link>http://fredbrunel.com/journal/2006/01/first-intel-macs-available/comment-page-1/#comment-21776</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredbrunel.com/journal/2006/01/first-intel-macs-available/#comment-21776</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow!  This sounds very bad for Motorola and IBM, yet good for potential users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And it signals a green light to those who were postponing development of products for Mac OS X.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also another archtectre for x86 Linux to support :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am mostly interested to hear if they are cool and quiet, or a little hot under the covers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  This sounds very bad for Motorola and IBM, yet good for potential users.<br /><br />And it signals a green light to those who were postponing development of products for Mac OS X.<br /><br />Also another archtectre for x86 Linux to support <img src='http://fredbrunel.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br /><br />I am mostly interested to hear if they are cool and quiet, or a little hot under the covers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

